Contact

Minehead

22 The Parks, Minehead,
Somerset, TA24 8BT
Minehead Solicitors

Taunton

17 The Crescent, Taunton,
Somerset, TA1 4EB
Taunton Solicitors

London

Central Court, ,
London, WC2A 1AL
London Solicitors
Enquiry form

Home / GTR Collective Proceedings

Collective Actions

GTR Collective Proceedings

We've issued a collective action on behalf of a class of around 1 million consumers against Govia Thameslink Railway Limited ("GTR") and its parent companies for over £400 million in damages.
julian-maitland-walker-our-lawyers-square
Key contact
See how we can help
you. Contact Julian Maitland-Walker
01643 707777 Email

Senior Partner

Julian Maitland-Walker has been in practice as a corporate and commercial lawyer since 1974, specialising in the field of European and Competition law where he is recognised as a Leading Individual described as “highly regarded" with a "high-quality competition law practice" by the Legal 500 Directory.

GTR

Brighton mainline by issuing tickets that, in breach of the fare-setting regulations, unlawfully restrict travel to Southern and/or Thameslink train brands when tickets should permit travel on all three GTR train brands (Gatwick Express, Southern and Thameslink).

GTR inflates the prices passengers pay for fares allowing travel on two or all three GTR train brands when passengers should be permitted to travel on all three brands.

It is also alleged that GTR unlawfully inflates fares where passengers use Oyster or contactless payment to tap in or tap out at London Victoria platforms 13 and 14, which are serviced mainly by Gatwick Express branded trains.

For more information, including to register to receive updates relating to this claim please visit the dedicated GTR Claim website at www.gtrclaim.co.uk or the Competition Appeals Tribunal website at www.catribunal.org.uk.  Media Contact: Joseph Siman at 07512 067530.

Background

The Claim states that the fare-setting regulatory regime does not entitle GTR to issue fares limited to only Southern and/or Thames link train brands (except for advance fares) but requires GTR’s fares to permit travel on all three brands. 

By charging higher prices for fares permitting travel on two or all three GTR train brands, GTR is abusing its dominant position in the market for rail services on the London-Brighton mainline in breach of Chapter II of the Competition Act 1998.

Similarly, where passengers pay using Oyster or contactless payment and tap in or tap out at London Victoria platforms 13 and 14 they pay more for the same journey than if they tapped in or tapped out at other platforms at London Victoria, in breach of the regulatory regime.

patricia-prudente-6UyWK8mDcWo-unsplash-scaled.jpg?w=683&h=1024&scale
  • "'Excellent service and understanding at all times. I would definitely recommend Maitland Walker to others. Thank you"
  • "I found James very courteous and efficient. He knew exactly what he was doing and I felt confident enough to let him shepherd me through the process of administering my late wife's estate"
  • "Excellent and efficient service. Kept me updated and handled well throughout."
● Awards

High Court considers whether there has been substantial interference with a private right of…

Read more
● Awards

Fraud Within Property Transactions Is On The Rise

Read more

Talk it over
with an expert

Get in touch for a free, no obligation call
with one of our friendly and professional team
Alternatively, fill in this form and we can contact you
Get in touch